2 /5 Rachel Martin-Austin: I had a consultation with this attorney recently. While he clearly has extensive experience in real estate law (which he mentioned repeatedly, citing 30 years in the field) the conversation was frustrating. He was a poor listener, more interested in hearing himself talk than understanding my concerns.
What stood out most was his inflated ego. He dominated the conversation, frequently interrupting and speaking in a patronizing tone that made the consultation feel less like a professional exchange and more like a lecture. His arrogance was palpable, and it made it difficult to get through even basic questions without being cut off or dismissed.
He was very eager for me to leave a review based solely on that first conversation. Something he clearly values, perhaps more than client outcomes. Curious, I looked through his other reviews expecting to find success stories that backed up the dramatic claims he made about his track record. Instead, I mostly saw comments from people who were encouraged to post reviews in exchange for a second consultation. There was little evidence to support the extraordinary success he boasts about.
Given the lack of verifiable results and the condescending way he engages with potential clients, I would strongly recommend asking for actual proof of his claimed accomplishments…. assuming you can get that far without being talked over.
